The examination now came down to the matter of the particular check for sixty thousand dollars which Albert Stires had handed Cowperwood on the afternoon—late—of October 9, 1871.
Shannon showed Stener the check itself.
Had he ever seen it?
Yes.
Where?
In the office of District Attorney Pettie on October 20th, or thereabouts last.
Was that the first time he had seen it?
Yes.
Had he ever heard about it before then?
Yes.
When?
On October 10th last.
Would he kindly tell the jury in his own way just how and under what circumstances he first heard of it then?
Stener twisted uncomfortably in his chair.
It was a hard thing to do.
It was not a pleasant commentary on his own character and degree of moral stamina, to say the least.
However, he cleared his throat again and began a description of that small but bitter section of his life's drama in which Cowperwood, finding himself in a tight place and about to fail, had come to him at his office and demanded that he loan him three hundred thousand dollars more in one lump sum.
There was considerable bickering just at this point between Steger and Shannon, for the former was very anxious to make it appear that Stener was lying out of the whole cloth about this.
Steger got in his objection at this point, and created a considerable diversion from the main theme, because Stener kept saying he "thought" or he "believed."
"Object!" shouted Steger, repeatedly.
"I move that that be stricken from the record as incompetent, irrelevant, and immaterial.
The witness is not allowed to say what he thinks, and the prosecution knows it very well."
"Your honor," insisted Shannon, "I am doing the best I can to have the witness tell a plain, straightforward story, and I think that it is obvious that he is doing so."
"Object!" reiterated Steger, vociferously.
"Your honor, I insist that the district attorney has no right to prejudice the minds of the jury by flattering estimates of the sincerity of the witness.
What he thinks of the witness and his sincerity is of no importance in this case.
I must ask that your honor caution him plainly in this matter."
"Objection sustained," declared Judge Payderson, "the prosecution will please be more explicit"; and Shannon went on with his case.
Stener's testimony, in one respect, was most important, for it made plain what Cowperwood did not want brought out—namely, that he and Stener had had a dispute before this; that Stener had distinctly told Cowperwood that he would not loan him any more money; that Cowperwood had told Stener, on the day before he secured this check, and again on that very day, that he was in a very desperate situation financially, and that if he were not assisted to the extent of three hundred thousand dollars he would fail, and that then both he and Stener would be ruined.
On the morning of this day, according to Stener, he had sent Cowperwood a letter ordering him to cease purchasing city loan certificates for the sinking-fund.
It was after their conversation on the same afternoon that Cowperwood surreptitiously secured the check for sixty thousand dollars from Albert Stires without his (Stener's) knowledge; and it was subsequent to this latter again that Stener, sending Albert to demand the return of the check, was refused, though the next day at five o'clock in the afternoon Cowperwood made an assignment.
And the certificates for which the check had been purloined were not in the sinking-fund as they should have been.
This was dark testimony for Cowperwood.
If any one imagines that all this was done without many vehement objections and exceptions made and taken by Steger, and subsequently when he was cross-examining Stener, by Shannon, he errs greatly.
At times the chamber was coruscating with these two gentlemen's bitter wrangles, and his honor was compelled to hammer his desk with his gavel, and to threaten both with contempt of court, in order to bring them to a sense of order.
Indeed while Payderson was highly incensed, the jury was amused and interested.
"You gentlemen will have to stop this, or I tell you now that you will both be heavily fined.
This is a court of law, not a bar-room.
Mr. Steger, I expect you to apologize to me and your colleague at once.
Mr. Shannon, I must ask that you use less aggressive methods.
Your manner is offensive to me. It is not becoming to a court of law.
I will not caution either of you again."
Both lawyers apologized as lawyers do on such occasions, but it really made but little difference. Their individual attitudes and moods continued about as before.
"What did he say to you," asked Shannon of Stener, after one of these troublesome interruptions, "on that occasion, October 9th last, when he came to you and demanded the loan of an additional three hundred thousand dollars?
Give his words as near as you can remember—exactly, if possible."
"Object!" interposed Steger, vigorously.
"His exact words are not recorded anywhere except in Mr. Stener's memory, and his memory of them cannot be admitted in this case.
The witness has testified to the general facts."
Judge Payderson smiled grimly.
"Objection overruled," he returned.