Andrey Antonovitch!" cried Yulia Mihailovna in complete despair.
"Arrest her first!" shouted her husband, pointing his finger at her threateningly.
"Search her first!
The ball was arranged with a view to the fire...."
She screamed and fell into a swoon. (Oh, there was no doubt of its being a real one.) The general, the prince, and I rushed to her assistance; there were others, even among the ladies, who helped us at that difficult moment.
We carried the unhappy woman out of this hell to her carriage, but she only regained consciousness as she reached the house, and her first utterance was about Andrey Antonovitch again.
With the destruction of all her fancies, the only thing left in her mind was Andrey Antonovitch.
They sent for a doctor.
I remained with her for a whole hour; the prince did so too. The general, in an access of generous feeling (though he had been terribly scared), meant to remain all night "by the bedside of the unhappy lady," but within ten minutes he fell asleep in an arm-chair in the drawing-room while waiting for the doctor, and there we left him.
The chief of the police, who had hurried from the ball to the fire, had succeeded in getting Andrey Antonovitch out of the hall after us, and attempted to put him into Yulia Mihailovna's carriage, trying all he could to persuade his Excellency "to seek repose."
But I don't know why he did not insist.
Andrey Antonovitch, of course, would not hear of repose, and was set on going to the fire; but that was not a sufficient reason.
It ended in his taking him to the fire in his droshky.
He told us afterwards that Lembke was gesticulating all the way and "shouting orders that it was impossible to obey owing to their unusualness."
It was officially reported later on that his Excellency had at that time been in a delirious condition "owing to a sudden fright."
There is no need to describe how the ball ended.
A few dozen rowdy fellows, and with them some ladies, remained in the hall.
There were no police present.
They would not let the orchestra go, and beat the musicians who attempted to leave.
By morning they had pulled all Prohoritch's stall to pieces, had drunk themselves senseless, danced the Kamarinsky in its unexpurgated form, made the rooms in a shocking mess, and only towards daybreak part of this hopelessly drunken rabble reached the scene of the fire to make fresh disturbances there. The other part spent the night in the rooms dead drunk, with disastrous consequences to the velvet sofas and the floor.
Next morning, at the earliest possibility, they were dragged out by their legs into the street.
So ended the fete for the benefit of the governesses of our province.
IV
The fire frightened the inhabitants of the riverside just because it was evidently a case of arson.
It was curious that at the first cry of "fire" another cry was raised that the Shpigulin men had done it.
It is now well known that three Shpigulin men really did have a share in setting fire to the town, but that was all; all the other factory hands were completely acquitted, not only officially but also by public opinion.
Besides those three rascals (of whom one has been caught and confessed and the other two have so far escaped), Fedka the convict undoubtedly had a hand in the arson.
That is all that is known for certain about the fire till now; but when it comes to conjectures it's a very different matter.
What had led these three rascals to do it? Had they been instigated by anyone?
It is very difficult to answer all these questions even now.
Owing to the strong wind, the fact that the houses at the riverside were almost all wooden, and that they had been set fire to in three places, the fire spread quickly and enveloped the whole quarter with extraordinary rapidity. (The fire burnt, however, only at two ends; at the third spot it was extinguished almost as soon as it began to burn—of which later.) But the Petersburg and Moscow papers exaggerated our calamity. Not more than a quarter, roughly speaking, of the riverside district was burnt down; possibly less indeed.
Our fire brigade, though it was hardly adequate to the size and population of the town, worked with great promptitude and devotion.
But it would not have been of much avail, even with the zealous co-operation of the inhabitants, if the wind had not suddenly dropped towards morning.
When an hour after our flight from the ball I made my way to the riverside, the fire was at its height.
A whole street parallel with the river was in flames.
It was as light as day.
I won't describe the fire; every one in Russia knows what it looks like.
The bustle and crush was immense in the lanes adjoining the burning street.
The inhabitants, fully expecting the fire to reach their houses, were hauling out their belongings, but had not yet left their dwellings, and were waiting meanwhile sitting on their boxes and feather beds under their windows.
Part of the male population were hard at work ruthlessly chopping down fences and even whole huts which were near the fire and on the windward side.
None were crying except the children, who had been waked out of their sleep, though the women who had dragged out their chattels were lamenting in sing-song voices.
Those who had not finished their task were still silent, busily carrying out their goods.
Sparks and embers were carried a long way in all directions.
People put them out as best they could.
Some helped to put the fire out while others stood about, admiring it.
A great fire at night always has a thrilling and exhilarating effect. This is what explains the attraction of fireworks. But in that case the artistic regularity with which the fire is presented and the complete lack of danger give an impression of lightness and playfulness like the effect of a glass of champagne.
A real conflagration is a very different matter. Then the horror and a certain sense of personal danger, together with the exhilarating effect of a fire at night, produce on the spectator (though of course not in the householder whose goods are being burnt) a certain concussion of the brain and, as it were, a challenge to those destructive instincts which, alas, lie hidden in every heart, even that of the mildest and most domestic little clerk.... This sinister sensation is almost always fascinating.
"I really don't know whether one can look at a fire without a certain pleasure."
This is word for word what Stepan Trofimovitch said to me one night on returning home after he had happened to witness a fire and was still under the influence of the spectacle.
Of course, the very man who enjoys the spectacle will rush into the fire himself to save a child or an old woman; but that is altogether a different matter.